PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNH vs. MAMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UNH vs. MAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNH achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly higher than MAMA's 10.53% return. Over the past 10 years, UNH has underperformed MAMA with an annualized return of 13.32%, while MAMA has yielded a comparatively higher 35.78% annualized return.


UNH

1D
0.73%
1M
1.83%
YTD
24.71%
6M
20.44%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
-4.10%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
13.32%

MAMA

1D
0.81%
1M
9.07%
YTD
10.53%
6M
11.85%
1Y
87.31%
3Y*
75.68%
5Y*
38.65%
10Y*
35.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNH vs. MAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
24.71%-33.14%-2.41%0.80%6.94%45.20%21.25%20.00%14.52%39.83%
MAMA
Mama's Creations Inc.
10.53%69.47%62.12%173.54%-10.70%12.29%47.93%75.36%-46.92%80.56%

Correlation

The correlation between UNH and MAMA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UNH:

$371.75B

MAMA:

$645.92M

EPS

UNH:

$13.23

MAMA:

$0.15

PE Ratio

UNH:

30.88

MAMA:

101.52

PS Ratio

UNH:

0.83

MAMA:

3.28

PB Ratio

UNH:

3.58

MAMA:

11.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

UNH:

$449.71B

MAMA:

$189.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UNH:

$84.55B

MAMA:

$46.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

UNH:

$22.99B

MAMA:

$11.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNH vs. MAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MAMA
MAMA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNH vs. MAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNHMAMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.65

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

9.06

-6.63

UNH vs. MAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNH Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the MAMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNH and MAMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNH vs. MAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNH drawdown since its inception was -74.37%, smaller than the maximum MAMA drawdown of -89.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNH and MAMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHMAMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.37%

-89.83%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.96%

-24.05%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.39%

-42.54%

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.39%

-68.85%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.39%

-79.35%

+17.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.27%

-14.21%

-18.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.77%

-45.79%

+31.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

9.67%

+3.52%

Volatility

UNH vs. MAMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) is 7.60%, while Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that UNH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHMAMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

19.32%

-11.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.86%

33.09%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.10%

52.50%

-12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.87%

57.99%

-26.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

81.61%

-51.43%

Dividends

UNH vs. MAMA - Dividend Comparison

UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while MAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAMA
Mama's Creations Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.16%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%

Financials

UNH vs. MAMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Mama's Creations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
111.72B
52.77M
(UNH) Total Revenue
(MAMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UNH vs. MAMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Mama's Creations Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
22.7%
23.6%
Portfolio components
UNH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 25.41B and revenue of 111.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.

MAMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.

UNH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 8.99B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

MAMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

UNH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a net income of 6.28B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

MAMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UNH and MAMA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAMA has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to UNH (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNH dropped -74.37% vs MAMA's -89.83%.

MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNH and MAMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer