PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNG vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -15.01% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 62.54% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of -22.23%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return.


UNG

1D
-1.23%
1M
-11.39%
6M
1.17%
YTD
-15.01%
1Y
-34.05%
3Y*
-27.27%
5Y*
-27.30%
10Y*
-22.23%

DBO

1D
-1.54%
1M
4.37%
6M
58.01%
YTD
62.54%
1Y
51.12%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-15.01%-27.07%-17.11%-64.04%12.89%35.76%-45.43%-31.77%5.96%-37.58%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
62.54%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UNG and DBO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2007

0.16

The correlation between UNG and DBO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNG
UNG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
UNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
UNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNGDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.24

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

1.85

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

4.96

-6.29

UNG vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNG and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than DBO's maximum drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNGDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-90.18%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-27.73%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.16%

-28.20%

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.49%

-37.68%

-54.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.55%

-61.69%

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.87%

-57.23%

-42.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-62.22%

-27.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.76%

10.33%

+15.43%

Volatility

UNG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) is 10.58%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.80%. This indicates that UNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNGDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.58%

13.80%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.34%

31.15%

+17.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

36.05%

+23.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.19%

32.93%

+31.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.74%

31.92%

+22.82%

UNG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.16%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNG and DBO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (13.80%) compared to UNG (10.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 10.34% vs -22.23% for UNG. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, UNG has been the lower-risk option at 10.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 10.34% return vs -22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for UNG.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for UNG.

UNG tracks Front Month Natural Gas Futures, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: USCF Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for UNG and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNG and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer