PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNCRY vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UniCredit SpA ADR (UNCRY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNCRY achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 15.22% return.


UNCRY

1D
1.12%
1M
4.57%
6M
15.64%
YTD
16.33%
1Y
46.60%
3Y*
64.13%
5Y*
61.66%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-1.65%
1M
-3.18%
6M
13.83%
YTD
15.22%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UNCRY
UniCredit SpA ADR
16.33%118.78%57.92%103.38%-2.49%71.06%6.09%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
15.22%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between UNCRY and QQQM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.32

The correlation between UNCRY and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNCRY vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNCRY
UNCRY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UNCRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNCRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNCRY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UNCRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNCRY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UniCredit SpA ADR (UNCRY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNCRYQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.30

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

8.14

-3.29

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNCRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNCRY and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNCRY drawdown since its inception was -70.20%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNCRY and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNCRYQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.20%

-35.04%

-35.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-11.96%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

-22.70%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.77%

-35.04%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-5.28%

+4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.17%

-8.15%

-19.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.64%

3.37%

+6.27%

Volatility

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

UniCredit SpA ADR (UNCRY) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 7.39%. This indicates that UNCRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNCRYQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.71%

7.39%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.57%

15.34%

+13.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.40%

18.54%

+14.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.24%

22.65%

+16.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.15%

22.30%

+19.85%

Dividends

UNCRY vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

UNCRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.45%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%
UNCRY
UniCredit SpA ADR
3.85%4.00%7.31%3.91%4.01%0.94%0.00%1.37%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNCRY and QQQM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNCRY has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to QQQM (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNCRY dropped -70.20% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNCRY and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer