UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both Utilities Equities funds. UMVP.TO is passively managed, while CINF.TO is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UMVP.TO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -2.58%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CINF.TO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 16.22%
• YTD: 17.91%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	13.06%
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between UMVP.TO and CINF.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026	0.45

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMVP.TO	CINF.TO
Utilities	41.5%	40.5%
Energy	35.9%	16.7%
Communication Services	22.5%	1.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	31.2%
Real Estate	-	9.8%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMVP.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CINF.TO

CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMVP.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.15	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.29	—

Drawdowns

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.86%, smaller than the maximum CINF.TO drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMVP.TO and CINF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMVP.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-12.27%	+7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-0.35%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-2.05%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UMVP.TO	CINF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	9.55%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.75%	11.96%	-2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.75%	12.08%	-2.33%

Dividends

UMVP.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

UMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than CINF.TO's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool	2.41%	2.80%	3.06%	3.45%	3.51%	3.56%	2.27%
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMVP.TO and CINF.TO in my portfolio?

UMVP.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between UMVP.TO and CINF.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and CI.