UMMA vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).
UMMA and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMMA is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2022. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both UMMA and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UMMA vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMMA vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 5.89% | 26.65% | 4.67% | 18.84% | -21.62% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.18% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -24.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMMA achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -6.18% return.
UMMA
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.65%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMMA vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMMA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMMA vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
UMMA
XLK
UMMA vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMMA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.13 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 1.71 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.97 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 6.31 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMMA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.13 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMMA and XLK is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UMMA vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
UMMA vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMMA drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMA and XLK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMMA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -82.05% | +47.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -15.92% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | -11.04% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -35.17% | +25.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 4.98% | -1.21% |
Volatility
UMMA vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 8.12%. This indicates that UMMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMMA | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.33% | 8.12% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 16.49% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.99% | 27.05% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 24.72% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 24.33% | -4.09% |