UMI vs. VCRM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) and VCRM (Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by USCF, while VCRM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P Broad AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. UMI is actively managed, while VCRM is passively managed. Over the past year, UMI returned 28.25% vs 5.74% for VCRM. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. UMI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VCRM.

Performance

UMI vs. VCRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 26.70% return, which is significantly higher than VCRM's 1.09% return.

UMI

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: 18.07%
• YTD: 26.70%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 26.23%
• 5Y*: 22.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.58%

VCRM

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 1Y: 5.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	$1.28M	$1.03M	$1.15M
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	$17.32M	$17.04M	$19.24M

UMI vs. VCRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	26.70%	5.11%	-3.75%
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	1.09%	4.91%	-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UMI and VCRM is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	-0.07

The correlation between UMI and VCRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UMI vs. VCRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 83
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 76

VCRM

VCRM Risk / Return Rank: 82
VCRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VCRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
VCRM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VCRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
VCRM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UMI vs. VCRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMI	VCRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.15	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	3.09	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.47	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	2.43	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.51	8.53	+0.98

UMI vs. VCRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the VCRM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI and VCRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMI vs. VCRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than VCRM's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and VCRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMI	VCRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.08%	-4.12%	-43.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.50%	-2.72%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-1.65%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.53%	-1.07%	-5.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	0.78%	+2.20%

Volatility

UMI vs. VCRM - Volatility Comparison

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) at 1.04%. This indicates that UMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMI	VCRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	1.04%	+4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	2.39%	+9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.59%	3.08%	+11.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.35%	3.81%	+15.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.10%	3.81%	+19.29%

UMI vs. VCRM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VCRM's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMI vs. VCRM - Dividend Comparison

UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than VCRM's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	5.80%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	3.41%	3.42%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMI and VCRM in my portfolio?

UMI and VCRM have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMI or VCRM?

UMI has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to VCRM (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMI dropped -48.08% vs VCRM's -4.12%.

Which ETF is better, UMI or VCRM?

On 1-year performance, UMI leads with 28.25% vs 5.74% for VCRM. On fees, VCRM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VCRM has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMI or VCRM?

Over the 1-year period, UMI has performed better with a 28.25% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMI or VCRM?

VCRM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMI or VCRM?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 3.41% for VCRM.

What is the main difference between UMI and VCRM?

UMI is categorized as Energy Equities, while VCRM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UMI and 0.12% for VCRM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VCRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.