PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMI.BR vs. BAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Umicore SA (UMI.BR) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UMI.BR is traded in EUR, while BAB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BAB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMI.BR achieves a 30.90% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, UMI.BR has outperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of 2.60%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.19% annualized return.


UMI.BR

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.67%
YTD
30.90%
6M
50.01%
1Y
127.93%
3Y*
-2.53%
5Y*
-11.72%
10Y*
2.60%

BAB.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-15.70%
6M
-10.84%
1Y
-3.69%
3Y*
48.93%
5Y*
28.96%
10Y*
1.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMI.BR
Umicore SA
30.90%85.26%-58.27%-25.60%-1.84%-7.70%-8.80%27.60%-10.27%50.96%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-15.70%137.01%34.16%43.54%-15.99%21.23%-57.94%45.71%-28.66%-26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UMI.BR and BAB.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.29

The correlation between UMI.BR and BAB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMI.BR
UMI.BR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Umicore SA (UMI.BR) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMI.BRBAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.01

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

-0.10

+4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

-0.26

+10.87

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the BAB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI.BR and BAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMI.BRBAB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

-0.10

+2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.84

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.03

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.17

+0.05

Drawdowns

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI.BR drawdown since its inception was -86.39%, roughly equal to the maximum BAB.L drawdown of -83.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI.BR and BAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMI.BRBAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.39%

-83.34%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.72%

-36.67%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.99%

-36.67%

-35.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.39%

-36.67%

-49.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.39%

-80.18%

-6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.77%

-30.66%

-25.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-33.73%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

14.31%

-2.31%

Volatility

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison

Umicore SA (UMI.BR) has a higher volatility of 20.30% compared to Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) at 12.05%. This indicates that UMI.BR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMI.BRBAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.30%

12.05%

+8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

26.39%

+9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.55%

35.60%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

34.34%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.40%

37.83%

-1.43%

Dividends

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison

UMI.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than BAB.L's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%
UMI.BR
Umicore SA
2.19%1.40%6.92%2.77%2.33%2.10%0.64%1.79%2.08%2.48%4.80%5.17%

Financials

UMI.BR vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Umicore SA and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. UMI.BR values in EUR, BAB.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


UMI.BR and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMI.BR and BAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer