UMDD vs. LABU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 12.78%/yr vs -11.11%/yr for LABU. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for LABU.

Performance

UMDD vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 41.42% return, which is significantly higher than LABU's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of 12.78%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -11.11% annualized return.

UMDD

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 15.21%
• YTD: 41.42%
• 6M: 35.75%
• 1Y: 75.75%
• 3Y*: 23.57%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

LABU

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 207.12%
• 3Y*: 6.07%
• 5Y*: -34.35%
• 10Y*: -11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	41.42%	-2.57%	19.68%	27.21%	-49.60%	72.27%	-17.30%	78.90%	-40.29%	49.17%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	12.06%	79.17%	-26.02%	-13.41%	-80.36%	-64.15%	74.66%	75.50%	-57.61%	149.12%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and LABU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015	0.59

The correlation between UMDD and LABU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

UMDD vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMDD	LABU
Industrials	24.8%	-
Technology	17.9%	-
Financial Services	13.6%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	99.7%
Real Estate	7.3%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 49
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 56

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 83
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMDD	LABU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.57	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.89	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	6.49	-3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	18.31	-9.73

UMDD vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and LABU.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	LABU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-99.18%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	-30.70%	+4.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.33%	-78.30%	+17.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	-97.59%	+32.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	-98.96%	+12.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-96.05%	+92.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.58%	-81.69%	+58.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.78%	10.91%	-3.13%

Volatility

UMDD vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 14.80%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 31.31%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	LABU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.80%	31.31%	-16.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.26%	61.52%	-26.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.64%	77.69%	-30.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.05%	95.70%	-36.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.32%	95.45%	-33.13%

UMDD vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMDD vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than LABU's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.69%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	0.74%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMDD and LABU in my portfolio?

UMDD and LABU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMDD or LABU?

LABU has higher volatility (31.31%) compared to UMDD (14.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs LABU's -99.18%.

Which ETF is better, UMDD or LABU?

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 12.78% vs -11.11% for LABU. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 14.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMDD or LABU?

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 12.78% return vs -11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMDD or LABU?

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMDD or LABU?

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.69% for LABU.

What is the main difference between UMDD and LABU?

UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 1.12% for LABU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.