PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMDD vs. INDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMDD vs. INDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 41.42% return, which is significantly higher than INDL's -23.37% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has outperformed INDL with an annualized return of 12.78%, while INDL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.22% annualized return.


UMDD

1D
2.20%
1M
10.73%
YTD
41.42%
6M
35.75%
1Y
66.43%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
12.78%

INDL

1D
2.23%
1M
0.60%
YTD
-23.37%
6M
-20.84%
1Y
-28.42%
3Y*
-0.01%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. INDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
41.42%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
-23.37%-3.21%7.56%26.06%-22.88%40.26%-36.43%3.15%-34.29%127.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and INDL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010

0.52

The correlation between UMDD and INDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMDD vs. INDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UMDD
INDL

Industrials

13.4%
10.3%

Technology

9.0%
8.2%

Financial Services

7.1%
28.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
12.4%

Healthcare

4.8%
6.1%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.4%

Energy

2.7%
9.4%

Basic Materials

2.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
6.3%

Utilities

1.6%
4.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
4.6%

Industrials

UMDD
13.4%
INDL
10.3%

Technology

UMDD
9.0%
INDL
8.2%

Financial Services

UMDD
7.1%
INDL
28.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UMDD
5.1%
INDL
12.4%

Healthcare

UMDD
4.8%
INDL
6.1%

Real Estate

UMDD
3.9%
INDL
1.4%

Energy

UMDD
2.7%
INDL
9.4%

Basic Materials

UMDD
2.6%
INDL
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

UMDD
2.2%
INDL
6.3%

Utilities

UMDD
1.6%
INDL
4.5%

Communication Services

UMDD
0.5%
INDL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMDD vs. INDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

INDL
INDL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. INDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UMDDINDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.85

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

-0.75

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

-1.55

+10.13

UMDD vs. INDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the INDL Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and INDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. INDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum INDL drawdown of -95.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and INDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMDDINDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-95.67%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-37.82%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.33%

-47.64%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.61%

-47.64%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.24%

-91.96%

+5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-78.43%

+75.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-66.36%

+42.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

18.35%

-10.57%

Volatility

UMDD vs. INDL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a higher volatility of 14.80% compared to Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) at 8.12%. This indicates that UMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMDDINDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.80%

8.12%

+6.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.26%

25.59%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.64%

29.71%

+17.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.05%

30.62%

+28.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.32%

52.69%

+9.63%

UMDD vs. INDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than INDL's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMDD vs. INDL - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than INDL's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
1.64%1.42%2.79%1.65%0.09%2.35%0.00%0.68%0.18%0.31%0.00%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.74%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMDD and INDL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMDD has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to INDL (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs INDL's -95.67%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 12.78% vs 0.22% for INDL. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, INDL has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for INDL.

INDL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.74% for UMDD.

UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while INDL tracks Indus India Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 1.33% for INDL.

UMDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMDD and INDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer