PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDL vs. GLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDL vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDL achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, INDL has underperformed GLIN with an annualized return of 1.06%, while GLIN has yielded a comparatively higher 2.82% annualized return.


INDL

1D
-3.73%
1M
1.96%
YTD
-21.27%
6M
-22.49%
1Y
-24.89%
3Y*
0.97%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
1.06%

GLIN

1D
-2.40%
1M
4.54%
YTD
1.48%
6M
0.11%
1Y
0.38%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
2.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDL vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
-21.27%-3.21%7.56%26.06%-22.88%40.26%-36.43%3.15%-34.29%127.98%
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
1.48%-5.47%15.64%36.13%-21.46%29.57%-0.29%-21.49%-37.41%66.53%

Correlation

The correlation between INDL and GLIN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.83

The correlation between INDL and GLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

INDL vs. GLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDL
GLIN

Financial Services

28.9%
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
14.5%

Industrials

10.6%
20.5%

Energy

9.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

8.6%
8.1%

Technology

8.0%
2.0%

Healthcare

6.1%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
0.6%

Communication Services

5.1%
5.2%

Utilities

4.4%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.0%

Financial Services

INDL
28.9%
GLIN
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INDL
12.0%
GLIN
14.5%

Industrials

INDL
10.6%
GLIN
20.5%

Energy

INDL
9.1%
GLIN
2.2%

Basic Materials

INDL
8.6%
GLIN
8.1%

Technology

INDL
8.0%
GLIN
2.0%

Healthcare

INDL
6.1%
GLIN
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

INDL
5.8%
GLIN
0.6%

Communication Services

INDL
5.1%
GLIN
5.2%

Utilities

INDL
4.4%
GLIN
3.6%

Real Estate

INDL
1.3%
GLIN
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDL vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDL
INDL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIN
GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDL vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDLGLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.02

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

0.02

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

0.06

-1.38

INDL vs. GLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the GLIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDL and GLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDL vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDL drawdown since its inception was -95.67%, which is greater than GLIN's maximum drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDL and GLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDLGLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.67%

-79.36%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.82%

-18.56%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.64%

-26.77%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.64%

-30.97%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.96%

-74.80%

-17.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.84%

-42.32%

-35.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.38%

-50.93%

-15.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.84%

6.38%

+12.46%

Volatility

INDL vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) at 6.25%. This indicates that INDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDLGLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

6.25%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.26%

15.84%

+10.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.04%

18.07%

+11.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.72%

18.32%

+12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.52%

23.67%

+28.85%

INDL vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDL has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDL vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison

INDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than GLIN's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
0.83%0.84%3.58%0.96%1.70%0.00%0.24%1.42%0.12%0.10%1.39%3.11%
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
1.60%1.42%2.79%1.65%0.09%2.35%0.00%0.68%0.18%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, INDL and GLIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

INDL has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to GLIN (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDL dropped -95.67% vs GLIN's -79.36%.

On 10-year performance, GLIN leads with 2.82% vs 1.06% for INDL. On fees, GLIN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, GLIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLIN has performed better with a 2.82% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLIN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for INDL.

INDL has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.83% for GLIN.

INDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. INDL tracks Indus India Index (300%), while GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for INDL and 0.82% for GLIN.

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDL and GLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer