UMDD vs. DBE
UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UMDD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 11.02%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for DBE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
UMDD vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 36.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UMDD having a 11.02% annualized return and DBE not far ahead at 11.15%.
UMDD
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- 6M
- 18.94%
- YTD
- 36.23%
- 1Y
- 44.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
DBE
- 1D
- 6.87%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 62.18%
- YTD
- 66.08%
- 1Y
- 53.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
UMDD vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 36.23% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 66.08% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 19.72% | -12.95% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and DBE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.29 |
The correlation between UMDD and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
DBE
UMDD vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMDD | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.16 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 6.57 | -0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, roughly equal to the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -86.69% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -24.72% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.33% | -24.72% | -35.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | -38.74% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | -60.84% | -25.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -36.95% | +29.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -57.20% | +33.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 8.13% | -0.31% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) have volatilities of 12.69% and 12.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.69% | 12.49% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.24% | 32.73% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.53% | 36.03% | +11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.88% | 29.89% | +28.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.09% | 28.40% | +33.69% |
UMDD vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
UMDD vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than DBE's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.33% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMDD and DBE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMDD has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to DBE (12.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 11.15% vs 11.02% for UMDD. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 12.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.68% for UMDD.
UMDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMDD and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer