NMAVX vs. ACLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX).
NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013. ACLAX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Mar 31, 2004.
Performance
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 1.05% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class | 0.93% | 8.52% | 8.18% | 5.93% | -1.53% | 23.01% | 1.44% | 28.55% | -12.93% | 11.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMAVX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than ACLAX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NMAVX has underperformed ACLAX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while ACLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.37% annualized return.
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
ACLAX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NMAVX and ACLAX have an expense ratio of 1.22%.
Return for Risk
NMAVX vs. ACLAX — Risk / Return Rank
NMAVX
ACLAX
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMAVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.53 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 0.87 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.67 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 2.51 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMAVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.53 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.43 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.48 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMAVX and ACLAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Dividend Comparison
NMAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than ACLAX's 14.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.99% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class | 14.04% | 14.24% | 8.53% | 5.01% | 14.77% | 15.72% | 1.62% | 1.23% | 14.17% | 9.25% | 3.82% | 10.86% |
Drawdowns
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMAVX drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum ACLAX drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAVX and ACLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMAVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -51.37% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -10.99% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -17.55% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | -39.24% | +8.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -8.01% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -6.29% | +2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.95% | +0.16% |
Volatility
NMAVX vs. ACLAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMAVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.69% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 8.51% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 15.58% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 14.63% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 17.48% | -2.43% |