FSOAX vs. SMVTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX).
FSOAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. SMVTX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Nov 30, 2001.
Performance
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOAX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A | 3.38% | -2.17% | -3.64% | 20.24% | -7.61% | 32.95% | 7.95% | 34.16% | -17.02% | 17.21% |
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 9.20% | 17.58% | 18.93% | 10.94% | -13.89% | 29.15% | -1.19% | 33.14% | -8.01% | 11.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOAX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than SMVTX's 9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FSOAX has underperformed SMVTX with an annualized return of 8.30%, while SMVTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
FSOAX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -3.21%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
SMVTX
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 34.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SMVTX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSOAX vs. SMVTX — Risk / Return Rank
FSOAX
SMVTX
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSOAX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 1.69 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 2.29 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 2.46 | -1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 11.87 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOAX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.69 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.47 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOAX and SMVTX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Dividend Comparison
FSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.05%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOAX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.90% | 2.43% | 8.70% | 0.82% | 5.59% | 17.03% | 7.64% | 22.64% | 1.10% |
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 15.05% | 16.44% | 15.96% | 1.16% | 6.75% | 18.53% | 2.52% | 5.82% | 14.47% | 20.86% | 3.61% | 7.05% |
Drawdowns
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOAX drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, which is greater than SMVTX's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOAX and SMVTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOAX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.02% | -54.72% | -15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -14.46% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.33% | -25.44% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.99% | -45.45% | -2.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.87% | -4.56% | -13.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -8.28% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 3.00% | +1.24% |
Volatility
FSOAX vs. SMVTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) is 5.24%, while Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that FSOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMVTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSOAX | SMVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 6.31% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 12.00% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.58% | 20.93% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 20.36% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 20.59% | +1.65% |