PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASPX vs. ACLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASPX achieves a 20.37% return, which is significantly higher than ACLAX's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FASPX has outperformed ACLAX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while ACLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


FASPX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.04%
YTD
20.37%
6M
23.46%
1Y
41.63%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
10.56%

ACLAX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.51%
YTD
7.11%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.50%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
20.37%7.76%-2.60%19.93%-7.82%32.65%7.70%33.85%-17.27%17.34%
ACLAX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class
7.11%8.52%8.18%5.93%-1.53%23.01%1.44%28.55%-12.93%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FASPX and ACLAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2005

0.92

The correlation between FASPX and ACLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASPX vs. ACLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASPX
FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLAX
ACLAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ACLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASPXACLAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.27

+1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

1.96

+1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

1.73

+2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.11

5.54

+9.56

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the ACLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASPX and ACLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASPXACLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.27

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.44

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Drawdowns

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASPX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than ACLAX's maximum drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASPX and ACLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASPXACLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.11%

-51.37%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-8.50%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.53%

-14.67%

-19.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-17.55%

-16.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.02%

-39.24%

-8.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.37%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-6.26%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.65%

+0.01%

Volatility

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FASPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASPXACLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.94%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

8.45%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

11.88%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

14.65%

+6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

17.48%

+4.53%

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASPX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASPX vs. ACLAX - Dividend Comparison

FASPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, less than ACLAX's 13.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACLAX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class
13.23%14.24%8.53%5.01%14.77%15.72%1.62%1.23%14.17%9.25%3.82%10.86%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
7.75%9.32%0.00%2.40%1.93%7.80%0.55%4.98%15.67%7.26%21.61%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASPX and ACLAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASPX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to ACLAX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASPX dropped -70.11% vs ACLAX's -51.37%.

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASPX and ACLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer