UMBMX vs. LLSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX).
UMBMX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2006. LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989.
Performance
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund | 1.19% | 15.46% | 22.93% | 12.73% | -17.31% | 15.69% | 27.28% | 20.76% | -9.83% | 24.04% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMBMX achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, UMBMX has outperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 12.05%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.69% annualized return.
UMBMX
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 20.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UMBMX and LLSCX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
UMBMX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
UMBMX
LLSCX
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMBMX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.15 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 0.32 | +1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.04 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.10 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 0.30 | +6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMBMX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.15 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.11 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.27 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMBMX and LLSCX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
UMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than LLSCX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund | 10.17% | 10.29% | 15.75% | 0.17% | 4.21% | 11.54% | 2.40% | 0.74% | 8.09% | 8.38% | 2.39% | 8.74% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
Drawdowns
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMBMX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBMX and LLSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMBMX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.91% | -63.97% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -10.47% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -28.37% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.91% | -42.23% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -7.92% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -8.90% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.68% | -0.81% |
Volatility
UMBMX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) at 3.90%. This indicates that UMBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMBMX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 3.90% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 9.23% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | 15.42% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 17.00% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 24.58% | -5.54% |