UMBMX vs. IWR
Compare and contrast key facts about Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR).
UMBMX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2006. IWR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001.
Performance
UMBMX vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMBMX vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund | 4.28% | 15.46% | 22.93% | 12.73% | -17.31% | 15.69% | 27.28% | 20.76% | -9.83% | 24.04% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.98% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMBMX achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, UMBMX has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 12.39%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.
UMBMX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
IWR
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMBMX vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMBMX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMBMX vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
UMBMX
IWR
UMBMX vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMBMX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.85 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.31 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.24 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 5.71 | +2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMBMX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.85 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.38 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.48 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMBMX and IWR is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UMBMX vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
UMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than IWR's 1.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund | 9.87% | 10.29% | 15.75% | 0.17% | 4.21% | 11.54% | 2.40% | 0.74% | 8.09% | 8.38% | 2.39% | 8.74% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.27% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
Drawdowns
UMBMX vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMBMX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBMX and IWR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMBMX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.91% | -58.78% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -13.38% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -26.18% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.91% | -40.59% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -5.09% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -7.85% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.91% | -0.01% |
Volatility
UMBMX vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 5.48%. This indicates that UMBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMBMX | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 5.48% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 10.48% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 19.08% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 18.24% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 19.35% | -0.29% |