PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBHX vs. EMCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UMBHX

1D
0.29%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMCAX

1D
1.46%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
12.65%
6M
9.02%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UMBHX and EMCAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBHX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBHX

EMCAX
EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMBHXEMCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.70

0.46

+2.24

Drawdowns

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBHX drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBHX and EMCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBHXEMCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-51.81%

+49.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.15%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-13.27%

+12.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBHXEMCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

14.22%

+10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.77%

18.18%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

20.24%

+4.53%

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBHX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMBHX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
0.12%0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.51%7.46%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMBHX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBHX and EMCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer