UMBHX vs. ISCGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) and ISCGX (Transamerica Small Cap Growth) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UMBHX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for ISCGX.

Performance

UMBHX vs. ISCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UMBHX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCGX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 11.04%
• 3Y*: 6.85%
• 5Y*: 0.53%
• 10Y*: 8.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBHX vs. ISCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	0.73%
ISCGX Transamerica Small Cap Growth	-0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between UMBHX and ISCGX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

UMBHX vs. ISCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCGX

ISCGX Risk / Return Rank: 9
ISCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ISCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ISCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
ISCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ISCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBHX vs. ISCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX) and Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMBHX	ISCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.70	0.45	+2.25

Drawdowns

UMBHX vs. ISCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBHX drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum ISCGX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBHX and ISCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMBHX	ISCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-39.22%	+37.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.22%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.46%	+14.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-11.21%	+10.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UMBHX	ISCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.77%	18.73%	+6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.77%	23.35%	+1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.77%	22.99%	+1.78%

UMBHX vs. ISCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBHX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCGX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMBHX vs. ISCGX - Dividend Comparison

UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISCGX Transamerica Small Cap Growth	14.16%	15.47%	12.92%	4.61%	4.29%	11.50%	8.30%	6.94%	11.71%	10.40%	121.18%	9.14%
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMBHX and ISCGX in my portfolio?

UMBHX and ISCGX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.