UMAR vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UMAR is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

UMAR vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAR achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.42% return.

UMAR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 12.79%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAR vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March	5.78%	2.67%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.42%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAR and JULB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

UMAR vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAR

UMAR Risk / Return Rank: 89
UMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
UMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
UMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
UMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAR vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMAR	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMAR	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	2.20	-1.16

Drawdowns

UMAR vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAR drawdown since its inception was -11.08%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAR and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAR	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-5.24%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-0.88%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UMAR	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.94%	6.83%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.54%	6.83%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.52%	6.83%	+0.69%

UMAR vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMAR vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither UMAR nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMAR and JULB in my portfolio?

UMAR and JULB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UMAR or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMAR or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMAR or JULB?

UMAR and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UMAR and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UMAR and 0.25% for JULB.