UMAR vs. GLDI
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI).
UMAR and GLDI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMAR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2020. GLDI is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2013. Both UMAR and GLDI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UMAR vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMAR vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March | -0.53% | 11.94% | 12.94% | 12.22% | -5.49% | 7.31% | 5.16% |
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 1.47% | 34.25% | 17.76% | 8.93% | -1.11% | -3.42% | 20.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMAR achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's 1.47% return.
UMAR
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 11.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMAR vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMAR vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank
UMAR
GLDI
UMAR vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMAR | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.86 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.39 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.87 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | 10.83 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMAR | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.86 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 1.13 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.37 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMAR and GLDI is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UMAR vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison
UMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.58%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 20.58% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
Drawdowns
UMAR vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMAR drawdown since its inception was -11.08%, smaller than the maximum GLDI drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAR and GLDI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMAR | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -32.26% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.56% | -13.73% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.72% | -14.07% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -7.90% | +5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -14.11% | +12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 2.37% | -1.34% |
Volatility
UMAR vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) is 2.74%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that UMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMAR | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 9.68% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 11.89% | -8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.65% | 13.84% | -6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 10.97% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 11.23% | -3.65% |