UMAC vs. GOOG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc) and GOOG (Alphabet Inc) are both stocks. UMAC operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while GOOG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, UMAC returned 189.11% vs 104.22% for GOOG. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UMAC vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAC achieves a 91.76% return, which is significantly higher than GOOG's 14.29% return.

UMAC

• 1D: -5.02%
• 1M: 50.80%
• YTD: 91.76%
• 6M: 143.81%
• 1Y: 189.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOG

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -8.88%
• YTD: 14.29%
• 6M: 15.49%
• 1Y: 104.22%
• 3Y*: 42.67%
• 5Y*: 23.51%
• 10Y*: 25.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAC vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc	91.76%	-24.26%	320.50%
GOOG Alphabet Inc	14.29%	65.42%	30.58%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAC and GOOG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024	0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap UMAC : $1.18B GOOG : $4.38T
EPS UMAC : -$0.18 GOOG : $13.11
PS Ratio UMAC : 44.78 GOOG : 10.35
PB Ratio UMAC : 3.55 GOOG : 9.16
Total Revenue (TTM) UMAC : $17.25M GOOG : $422.57B
Gross Profit (TTM) UMAC : $5.92M GOOG : $255.12B
EBITDA (TTM) UMAC : -$28.96M GOOG : $174.08B

Return for Risk

UMAC vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAC

UMAC Risk / Return Rank: 84
UMAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
UMAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
UMAC Omega Ratio Rank: 80
UMAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
UMAC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GOOG

GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 96
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAC vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMAC	GOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	3.60	-2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	4.96	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.59	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	4.99	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	17.56	-10.01

UMAC vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAC and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMAC vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAC drawdown since its inception was -75.61%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAC and GOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAC	GOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.61%	-44.60%	-31.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.63%	-20.75%	-31.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.90%	-10.19%	-16.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.13%	-8.89%	-37.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.13%	5.88%	+20.25%

Volatility

UMAC vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a higher volatility of 63.64% compared to Alphabet Inc (GOOG) at 7.29%. This indicates that UMAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAC	GOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	63.64%	7.29%	+56.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	100.84%	20.47%	+80.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.80%	28.75%	+106.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	164.83%	31.15%	+133.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	164.83%	29.02%	+135.81%

Dividends

UMAC vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

UMAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GOOG Alphabet Inc	0.24%	0.26%	0.32%
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMAC and GOOG in my portfolio?

UMAC and GOOG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMAC or GOOG?

UMAC has higher volatility (63.64%) compared to GOOG (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMAC dropped -75.61% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.