ULVM vs. PTF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index while PTF tracks the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 12.23%/yr vs 21.25%/yr for PTF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.

Performance

ULVM vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 69.43% return.

ULVM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 15.46%
• 1Y: 28.69%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: —

PTF

• 1D: -6.34%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: 69.43%
• 6M: 64.22%
• 1Y: 96.10%
• 3Y*: 41.16%
• 5Y*: 21.25%
• 10Y*: 26.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULVM vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	16.65%	15.84%	19.76%	10.16%	-9.04%	31.06%	3.51%	22.08%	-12.07%	4.11%
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF	69.43%	5.68%	43.65%	33.73%	-31.75%	18.10%	82.06%	46.71%	0.01%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and PTF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017	0.64

The correlation between ULVM and PTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ULVM vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ULVM	PTF
Financial Services	22.6%	1.5%
Technology	13.5%	93.8%
Industrials	12.3%	1.8%
Utilities	12.2%	-
Healthcare	10.2%	-
Real Estate	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Basic Materials	4.1%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	4.7%
Energy	3.3%	1.6%

Return for Risk

ULVM vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM

ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 86
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PTF

PTF Risk / Return Rank: 76
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULVM	PTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.34	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	2.67	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.37	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	5.37	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.39	20.37	-1.98

ULVM vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and PTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULVM	PTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-55.38%	+14.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-17.99%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.14%	-36.11%	+17.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.77%	-44.88%	+25.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-6.34%	+5.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-13.25%	+7.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	4.73%	-3.17%

Volatility

ULVM vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 3.34%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULVM	PTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	17.66%	-14.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.31%	32.05%	-23.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	41.37%	-30.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	35.58%	-20.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	33.29%	-14.47%

ULVM vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULVM vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF	0.01%	0.21%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.04%	0.26%
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	1.62%	1.81%	1.57%	1.94%	1.91%	1.36%	1.51%	1.88%	1.67%	0.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULVM and PTF in my portfolio?

ULVM and PTF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULVM or PTF?

PTF has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to ULVM (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs PTF's -55.38%.

Which ETF is better, ULVM or PTF?

On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 21.25% vs 12.23% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULVM or PTF?

Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 21.25% return vs 12.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULVM or PTF?

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULVM or PTF?

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

What is the main difference between ULVM and PTF?

ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.60% for PTF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.