PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULVM vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULVM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.


ULVM

1D
0.78%
1M
2.92%
YTD
14.99%
6M
15.51%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*

DBO

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
80.66%
6M
78.46%
1Y
78.18%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULVM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.99%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
80.66%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.23

The correlation between ULVM and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ULVM vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ULVM
DBO

Financial Services

22.5%
116.0%

Technology

13.1%

-

Utilities

12.6%

-

Industrials

12.2%

-

Healthcare

10.1%

-

Real Estate

8.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Financial Services

ULVM
22.5%
DBO
116.0%

Technology

ULVM
13.1%
DBO

-

Utilities

ULVM
12.6%
DBO

-

Industrials

ULVM
12.2%
DBO

-

Healthcare

ULVM
10.1%
DBO

-

Real Estate

ULVM
8.7%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ULVM
5.3%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

ULVM
4.7%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

ULVM
4.1%
DBO

-

Communication Services

ULVM
3.5%
DBO

-

Energy

ULVM
3.4%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULVM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULVMDBODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

2.28

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

2.88

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

4.62

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.27

9.43

+9.84

ULVM vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULVMDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.28

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.49

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.02

+0.56

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULVMDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-90.18%

+49.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-18.19%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-28.20%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

-37.68%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-52.46%

+52.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-62.25%

+56.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

8.92%

-7.36%

Volatility

ULVM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 3.13%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULVMDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

13.25%

-10.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.03%

28.15%

-20.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

34.54%

-23.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

32.28%

-16.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

31.78%

-12.92%

ULVM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULVM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than DBO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.94%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.57%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULVM and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to ULVM (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.57% vs 11.59% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.57% for ULVM.

ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while DBO is Oil & Gas. ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.78% for DBO.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULVM and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer