PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULTY vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULTY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.


ULTY

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.14%
6M
9.84%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
11.14%-0.84%0.54%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and QYLD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024

0.68

The correlation between ULTY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

ULTY vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ULTY
QYLD

Technology

54.6%
53.8%

Basic Materials

11.7%
1.1%

Industrials

9.3%
2.8%

Communication Services

8.9%
15.8%

Financial Services

8.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
12.3%

Healthcare

1.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

ULTY
54.6%
QYLD
53.8%

Basic Materials

ULTY
11.7%
QYLD
1.1%

Industrials

ULTY
9.3%
QYLD
2.8%

Communication Services

ULTY
8.9%
QYLD
15.8%

Financial Services

ULTY
8.6%
QYLD
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ULTY
5.2%
QYLD
12.3%

Healthcare

ULTY
1.8%
QYLD
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

ULTY
0.0%
QYLD
7.7%

Energy

ULTY

-

QYLD
0.6%

Real Estate

ULTY

-

QYLD
0.1%

Utilities

ULTY

-

QYLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULTY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULTYQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.63

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.84

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

28.36

-27.69

ULTY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTY and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULTYQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.80

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.59

-0.42

Drawdowns

ULTY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULTYQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.85%

-24.75%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.16%

-4.97%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-0.06%

-8.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-3.84%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.31%

0.85%

+11.46%

Volatility

ULTY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that ULTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULTYQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

1.85%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

7.12%

+7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

8.58%

+12.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

14.70%

+12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

15.49%

+11.43%

ULTY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULTY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.67%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
114.67%142.99%111.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULTY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTY has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 23.93% vs 8.24% for ULTY. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 23.93% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 114.67%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

ULTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ULTY and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULTY and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer