ULPIX vs. LGPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ULPIX (ProFunds UltraBull Fund) and LGPIX (ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund) are both mutual funds - ULPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while LGPIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, ULPIX returned 22.96%/yr vs 16.91%/yr for LGPIX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ULPIX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for LGPIX.

Performance

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULPIX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than LGPIX's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ULPIX has outperformed LGPIX with an annualized return of 22.96%, while LGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.91% annualized return.

ULPIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 11.31%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 20.35%
• 1Y: 54.19%
• 3Y*: 35.90%
• 5Y*: 18.94%
• 10Y*: 22.96%

LGPIX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 8.32%
• YTD: 13.95%
• 6M: 13.63%
• 1Y: 33.30%
• 3Y*: 26.79%
• 5Y*: 16.23%
• 10Y*: 16.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund	20.77%	25.47%	38.03%	45.59%	-39.16%	59.28%	19.12%	62.17%	-15.02%	42.77%
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund	13.95%	20.25%	35.00%	27.54%	-30.72%	38.06%	30.61%	28.72%	-1.75%	23.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ULPIX and LGPIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.96

The correlation between ULPIX and LGPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ULPIX vs. LGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULPIX

ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

LGPIX

LGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
LGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ULPIX	LGPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.16	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.90	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.37	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	2.40	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.50	9.70	+3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the LGPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULPIX and LGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ULPIX	LGPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.16	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.12	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.17	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.16	+0.08

Drawdowns

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.68%, which is greater than LGPIX's maximum drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULPIX and LGPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULPIX	LGPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.68%	-78.34%	-11.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.30%	-14.29%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.59%	-78.34%	+41.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.92%	-78.34%	+31.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.41%	-78.34%	+18.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-63.54%	+63.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.84%	-12.13%	-21.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	3.53%	+0.63%

Volatility

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) at 4.20%. This indicates that ULPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULPIX	LGPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	4.20%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.92%	12.44%	+5.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.69%	15.92%	+7.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.91%	138.98%	-105.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.45%	99.16%	-63.71%

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULPIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than LGPIX's 1.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULPIX vs. LGPIX - Dividend Comparison

ULPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than LGPIX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund	1.32%	1.51%	1.14%	1.55%	1.98%	6.65%	3.33%	4.40%	1.84%	0.00%	1.39%	0.06%
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund	7.54%	9.11%	0.00%	0.02%	10.36%	5.62%	12.74%	0.42%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULPIX and LGPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ULPIX and LGPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ULPIX or LGPIX?

ULPIX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to LGPIX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULPIX dropped -89.68% vs LGPIX's -78.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.