LGPIX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
LGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
LGPIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGPIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund | -12.06% | 20.25% | 35.00% | 27.54% | -30.72% | 38.06% | 30.61% | 28.72% | -1.75% | 23.39% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGPIX achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGPIX having a 13.94% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 14.05%.
LGPIX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- YTD
- -12.06%
- 6M
- -10.28%
- 1Y
- 16.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGPIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGPIX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGPIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
LGPIX
VOO
LGPIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.98 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.50 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.53 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 7.29 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.98 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.70 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.78 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.83 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGPIX and VOO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGPIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund | 1.71% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.98% | 6.65% | 3.33% | 4.40% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 1.39% | 0.06% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
LGPIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGPIX drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGPIX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.34% | -33.99% | -44.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -11.98% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.34% | -24.52% | -53.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.34% | -33.99% | -44.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.86% | -6.29% | -65.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -3.72% | -8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 2.52% | +1.09% |
Volatility
LGPIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that LGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGPIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 5.29% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 9.44% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 18.10% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.97% | 16.82% | +122.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.12% | 17.99% | +81.13% |