PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULPIX vs. BKPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULPIX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than BKPIX's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ULPIX has outperformed BKPIX with an annualized return of 22.96%, while BKPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.


ULPIX

1D
0.25%
1M
11.31%
YTD
20.77%
6M
20.35%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
35.90%
5Y*
18.94%
10Y*
22.96%

BKPIX

1D
2.37%
1M
0.10%
YTD
5.26%
6M
6.99%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
28.51%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
20.77%25.47%38.03%45.59%-39.16%59.28%19.12%62.17%-15.02%42.77%
BKPIX
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund
5.26%11.57%28.64%9.95%-30.83%52.43%-30.69%55.99%-27.23%26.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ULPIX and BKPIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between ULPIX and BKPIX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULPIX vs. BKPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULPIX
ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BKPIX
BKPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BKPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BKPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULPIXBKPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.36

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

3.41

+10.09

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the BKPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULPIX and BKPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULPIXBKPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

0.91

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.05

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.23

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.06

+0.19

Drawdowns

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.68%, smaller than the maximum BKPIX drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULPIX and BKPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULPIXBKPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.68%

-96.22%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.30%

-21.69%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.59%

-37.94%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.92%

-61.71%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-66.21%

+6.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-46.47%

+46.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.84%

-56.09%

+22.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

8.63%

-4.47%

Volatility

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) is 5.62%, while ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that ULPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULPIXBKPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

7.98%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

22.06%

-4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

32.23%

-8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.91%

40.75%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

43.42%

-7.97%

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULPIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BKPIX's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULPIX vs. BKPIX - Dividend Comparison

ULPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than BKPIX's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BKPIX
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund
1.35%1.42%0.75%1.64%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.38%1.53%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
7.54%9.11%0.00%0.02%10.36%5.62%12.74%0.42%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULPIX and BKPIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKPIX has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to ULPIX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULPIX dropped -89.68% vs BKPIX's -96.22%.

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULPIX and BKPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer