PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKPIX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKPIX achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than RMQAX's 16.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BKPIX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 12.03%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.71% annualized return.


BKPIX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.58%
6M
13.04%
YTD
20.43%
1Y
38.02%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
12.03%
ALL TIME*
4.51%

RMQAX

1D
7.48%
1M
-8.91%
6M
13.97%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
35.28%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
33.71%
ALL TIME*
31.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKPIX
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund
20.43%11.57%28.64%9.95%-30.83%52.43%-30.69%55.99%-27.23%26.77%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
16.20%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BKPIX and RMQAX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.45

The correlation between BKPIX and RMQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKPIX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKPIX
BKPIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BKPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BKPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKPIXRMQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.31

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

4.05

-0.26

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKPIX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKPIX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKPIXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.22%

-63.18%

-33.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.69%

-24.96%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.94%

-42.45%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.71%

-63.18%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.21%

-63.18%

-3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.76%

-17.08%

-21.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.98%

-12.85%

-43.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.63%

8.04%

+0.59%

Volatility

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) is 8.12%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a volatility of 14.58%. This indicates that BKPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKPIXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

14.58%

-6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.81%

32.55%

-10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.90%

39.23%

-7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.47%

47.24%

-6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.24%

46.82%

-3.58%

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKPIX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKPIX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

BKPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than RMQAX's 31.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BKPIX
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund
1.18%1.42%0.75%1.64%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.38%1.53%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
31.21%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKPIX and RMQAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMQAX has higher volatility (14.58%) compared to BKPIX (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKPIX dropped -96.22% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

BKPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKPIX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer