PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UL vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Unilever Group (UL) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 5.33%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 40.96% annualized return.


UL

1D
1.03%
1M
3.45%
YTD
-8.35%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
-14.93%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
5.33%

AVGO

1D
-0.91%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
10.62%
6M
6.58%
1Y
50.41%
3Y*
67.17%
5Y*
55.09%
10Y*
40.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UL vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UL
The Unilever Group
-8.35%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
10.62%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and AVGO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.22

The correlation between UL and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$129.35B

AVGO:

$1.86T

EPS

UL:

€5.06

AVGO:

$6.01

PE Ratio

UL:

10.06

AVGO:

63.58

PEG Ratio

UL:

1.97

AVGO:

0.79

PS Ratio

UL:

1.09

AVGO:

24.70

PB Ratio

UL:

7.20

AVGO:

21.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

€109.27B

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

€90.89B

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

€24.12B

AVGO:

$41.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.22

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

1.77

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

4.11

-5.34

UL vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UL vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-48.30%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-28.67%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-41.15%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.53%

-41.15%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

-48.30%

+18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.64%

-20.66%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-7.98%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.20%

12.30%

-0.10%

Volatility

UL vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Unilever Group (UL) is 6.11%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 20.53%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

20.53%

-14.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

35.04%

-18.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

45.57%

-24.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

43.39%

-22.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

39.52%

-17.91%

Dividends

UL vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than AVGO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.65%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
UL
The Unilever Group
3.87%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

UL vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B202120222023202420252026
18.38B
22.19B
(UL) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UL values in EUR, AVGO values in USD

UL vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Unilever Group and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2021202220232024202520260
67.2%
Portfolio components
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UL and AVGO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to UL (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer