UIVM vs. VFMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. UIVM is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIVM returned 11.92%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for VFMO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.

Performance

UIVM vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 25.84% return.

UIVM

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 31.33%
• 3Y*: 24.31%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: —

VFMO

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 25.84%
• 6M: 22.71%
• 1Y: 44.30%
• 3Y*: 27.88%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF	13.45%	45.47%	5.23%	16.79%	-13.31%	11.85%	0.76%	15.29%	-17.95%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	25.84%	17.39%	26.14%	16.25%	-12.84%	19.16%	31.36%	28.22%	-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and VFMO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.70

The correlation between UIVM and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

UIVM vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UIVM	VFMO
Financial Services	30.0%	6.5%
Industrials	21.2%	24.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.7%
Technology	6.6%	17.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	2.5%
Basic Materials	5.7%	6.4%
Healthcare	5.5%	22.9%
Utilities	4.9%	0.2%
Real Estate	4.5%	0.1%
Energy	4.2%	7.3%
Communication Services	3.0%	3.4%

Return for Risk

UIVM vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM

UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 65
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 61

VFMO

VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UIVM	VFMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.99	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.59	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	4.05	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	15.07	-4.72

UIVM vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and VFMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UIVM	VFMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.73%	-36.77%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-10.98%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.69%	-24.40%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.27%	-25.80%	-2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.83%	-2.31%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.65%	-7.73%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	2.95%	+0.08%

Volatility

UIVM vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 5.91%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UIVM	VFMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.91%	8.33%	-2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	17.49%	-4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.34%	22.34%	-7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	21.90%	-6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	23.64%	-6.39%

UIVM vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

UIVM vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than VFMO's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF	3.07%	3.70%	5.09%	4.35%	3.03%	3.48%	1.63%	3.49%	2.78%	0.15%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.39%	0.82%	0.72%	0.89%	1.72%	0.81%	0.45%	1.22%	0.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UIVM and VFMO in my portfolio?

UIVM and VFMO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UIVM or VFMO?

VFMO has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to UIVM (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

Which ETF is better, UIVM or VFMO?

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.02% vs 11.92% for UIVM. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UIVM or VFMO?

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UIVM or VFMO?

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UIVM or VFMO?

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.39% for VFMO.

What is the main difference between UIVM and VFMO?

They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.13% for VFMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.