UIVM vs. SGDM
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while SGDM is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIVM returned 11.89%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for SGDM. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.
Performance
UIVM vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's -4.58% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 33.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SGDM
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
UIVM vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 15.12% | 45.47% | 5.23% | 16.79% | -13.31% | 11.85% | 0.76% | 15.29% | -17.41% | 2.36% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -4.58% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and SGDM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.34 |
The correlation between UIVM and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UIVM vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UIVM
SGDM
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
UIVM
SGDM
-
Industrials
UIVM
SGDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
UIVM
SGDM
-
Consumer Defensive
UIVM
SGDM
-
Healthcare
UIVM
SGDM
-
Basic Materials
UIVM
SGDM
Utilities
UIVM
SGDM
-
Real Estate
UIVM
SGDM
-
Technology
UIVM
SGDM
-
Energy
UIVM
SGDM
-
Communication Services
UIVM
SGDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
SGDM
UIVM vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIVM | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.20 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 1.30 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 3.60 | +7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, smaller than the maximum SGDM drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -54.95% | +12.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -35.96% | +24.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | -35.96% | +24.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -45.06% | +16.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -30.31% | +29.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -25.46% | +15.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 12.93% | -9.90% |
Volatility
UIVM vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 6.01%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 16.53% | -10.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.25% | 38.64% | -25.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 46.24% | -30.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 36.11% | -20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 36.97% | -19.72% |
UIVM vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than SGDM's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.02% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and SGDM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to UIVM (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
On 5-year performance, SGDM leads with 17.23% vs 11.89% for UIVM. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SGDM has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.09% for SGDM.
UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while SGDM is Materials. UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.50% for SGDM.
UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer