UIVM vs. QQQA
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIVM returned 12.24%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for QQQA. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
UIVM vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 61.81% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 35.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- 20.23%
- YTD
- 61.81%
- 6M
- 65.69%
- 1Y
- 84.25%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
UIVM vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 15.98% | 45.47% | 5.23% | 16.79% | -13.31% | 0.97% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 61.81% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and QQQA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between UIVM and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
UIVM vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UIVM
QQQA
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
UIVM
QQQA
-
Industrials
UIVM
QQQA
-
Consumer Cyclical
UIVM
QQQA
Consumer Defensive
UIVM
QQQA
-
Healthcare
UIVM
QQQA
Technology
UIVM
QQQA
Basic Materials
UIVM
QQQA
-
Utilities
UIVM
QQQA
-
Real Estate
UIVM
QQQA
-
Energy
UIVM
QQQA
Communication Services
UIVM
QQQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
QQQA
UIVM vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIVM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 3.26 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.32 | 3.86 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.53 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 5.86 | -2.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 21.92 | -9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIVM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 3.26 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.57 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -38.44% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -14.54% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | -30.84% | +19.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -38.44% | +10.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -15.69% | +5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.88% | -0.88% |
Volatility
UIVM vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 5.30%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 10.17% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 22.12% | -9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 25.98% | -11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 25.82% | -10.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 25.76% | -8.55% |
UIVM vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.19% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and QQQA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to UIVM (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs QQQA's -38.44%.
On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.62% vs 12.24% for UIVM. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 12.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.58% for QQQA.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer