UIVM vs. EZMO
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and EZMO (AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. UIVM is passively managed, while EZMO is actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for EZMO.
Performance
UIVM vs. EZMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly higher than EZMO's -3.36% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.47%
EZMO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $253.93K | $173.70K | $167.73K | |
| $137.91K | $192.35K | $135.04K |
UIVM vs. EZMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 19.77% | 6.90% |
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | -3.36% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and EZMO is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. EZMO — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
EZMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UIVM vs. EZMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIVM | EZMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. EZMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than EZMO's maximum drawdown of -15.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and EZMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | EZMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -15.45% | -27.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -12.43% | +11.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -5.54% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
UIVM vs. EZMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | EZMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 17.21% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 17.21% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 17.21% | +0.01% |
UIVM vs. EZMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EZMO's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. EZMO - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while EZMO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.06% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and EZMO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for EZMO.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for EZMO.
They also come from different issuers: Victory and AlphaDroid. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.94% for EZMO.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and EZMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer