UITB vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
UITB and AGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UITB is an actively managed fund by Victory Capital. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003.
Performance
UITB vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UITB vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | -0.02% | 7.32% | 1.81% | 6.49% | -12.23% | -0.88% | 7.99% | 11.40% | -1.31% | 0.99% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.09% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 0.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UITB achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than AGG's 0.09% return.
UITB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
AGG
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UITB vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UITB vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank
UITB
AGG
UITB vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UITB | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.93 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.76 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | 4.89 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UITB | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.93 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.04 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between UITB and AGG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UITB vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
UITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than AGG's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.10% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.95% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
UITB vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UITB drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UITB and AGG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UITB | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -18.43% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.56% | -2.52% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.02% | -17.82% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.30% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -2.71% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.91% | -0.01% |
Volatility
UITB vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) is 1.55%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that UITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UITB | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 1.67% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 2.55% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 4.37% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 6.07% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 5.39% | -0.39% |