UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L
UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XWFS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Financials Equities funds - UIFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index while XWFS.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UIFS.L returned 15.44%/yr vs 21.05%/yr for XWFS.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIFS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XWFS.L.
Performance
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UIFS.L is traded in GBp, while XWFS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XWFS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIFS.L achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than XWFS.L's 0.60% return.
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
XWFS.L
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 15.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -2.73% |
XWFS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | 0.60% | 20.20% | 29.08% | 10.02% | -0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIFS.L and XWFS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between UIFS.L and XWFS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
UIFS.L
XWFS.L
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIFS.L | XWFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.62 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 5.18 | -4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIFS.L | XWFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.24 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.85 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIFS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than XWFS.L's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIFS.L and XWFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIFS.L | XWFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -16.47% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -9.64% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -16.47% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -0.92% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -4.11% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 3.01% | +2.52% |
Volatility
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) at 3.40%. This indicates that UIFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIFS.L | XWFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.40% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 9.82% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 12.57% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 16.04% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 16.04% | +4.08% |
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XWFS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIFS.L vs. XWFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIFS.L nor XWFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, UIFS.L and XWFS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWFS.L.
UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while XWFS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UIFS.L and 0.25% for XWFS.L.
Find the right allocation for UIFS.L and XWFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer