PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHS vs. GAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UHS vs. GAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and The Gap, Inc. (GAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -34.32% return, which is significantly lower than GAP's -15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed GAP with an annualized return of 0.99%, while GAP has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.


UHS

1D
-1.45%
1M
-15.82%
YTD
-34.32%
6M
-36.67%
1Y
-24.24%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*
0.99%

GAP

1D
-1.25%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-15.73%
6M
-15.47%
1Y
-0.21%
3Y*
34.89%
5Y*
-3.98%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHS vs. GAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
-34.32%22.02%18.19%8.83%9.37%-5.16%-4.00%23.62%3.16%6.93%
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
-15.73%11.74%16.14%96.66%-32.64%-11.11%15.73%-28.11%-21.95%56.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UHS and GAP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.21

The correlation between UHS and GAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

UHS:

$31.29

GAP:

$2.53

PE Ratio

UHS:

4.57

GAP:

8.42

PEG Ratio

UHS:

0.20

GAP:

0.25

PS Ratio

UHS:

0.39

GAP:

0.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

UHS:

$17.76B

GAP:

$15.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UHS:

$12.01B

GAP:

$6.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

UHS:

$2.79B

GAP:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHS vs. GAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHS
UHS Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
UHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
UHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHS Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GAP
GAP Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHS vs. GAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and The Gap, Inc. (GAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHSGAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.04

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.01

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

-0.02

-1.44

UHS vs. GAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the GAP Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHS and GAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UHSGAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

-0.00

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.07

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.09

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.17

+0.27

Drawdowns

UHS vs. GAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum GAP drawdown of -85.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and GAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHSGAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.27%

-85.61%

+25.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.52%

-28.33%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.52%

-38.00%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-76.13%

+31.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.30%

-83.13%

+26.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.30%

-31.99%

-9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-40.92%

+26.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.71%

11.41%

+5.30%

Volatility

UHS vs. GAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 6.50%, while The Gap, Inc. (GAP) has a volatility of 21.37%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHSGAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

21.37%

-14.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.04%

35.43%

-10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.08%

44.14%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

55.66%

-23.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.38%

55.31%

-20.93%

Dividends

UHS vs. GAP - Dividend Comparison

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than GAP's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
3.15%2.52%2.54%2.87%5.05%2.73%1.20%5.49%3.72%2.03%5.12%3.68%
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.56%0.37%0.45%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%

Financials

UHS vs. GAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and The Gap, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B20222023202420252026
4.50B
3.50B
(UHS) Total Revenue
(GAP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UHS vs. GAP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Health Services, Inc. and The Gap, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
40.5%
Portfolio components
UHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gap, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

UHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

GAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gap, Inc. reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

UHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

GAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Gap, Inc. reported a net income of 339.00M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UHS and GAP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAP has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to UHS (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs GAP's -85.61%.

GAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHS and GAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer