UHS vs. CBOE
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while CBOE operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 1.37%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for CBOE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHS vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -32.68% return, which is significantly lower than CBOE's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 1.37%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.84% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -32.68%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- 1Y
- -15.32%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
CBOE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -19.41%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- 22.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
UHS vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.68% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 18.03% | 29.96% | 10.74% | 44.37% | -2.16% | 42.23% | -21.17% | 24.16% | -20.60% | 70.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and CBOE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010 | 0.18 |
The correlation between UHS and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UHS:
$31.29
CBOE:
$11.77
UHS:
4.68
CBOE:
25.07
UHS:
0.20
CBOE:
0.47
UHS:
0.40
CBOE:
6.46
UHS:
$17.76B
CBOE:
$4.79B
UHS:
$12.01B
CBOE:
$2.50B
UHS:
$2.79B
CBOE:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
CBOE
UHS vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHS | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.23 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 1.29 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 5.70 | -6.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHS vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and CBOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -43.23% | -17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.52% | -24.69% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.52% | -24.69% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -24.69% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -43.23% | -13.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.85% | -19.41% | -20.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -11.41% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 5.58% | +11.75% |
Volatility
UHS vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 7.25%, while Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 15.70% | -8.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 24.24% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.46% | 27.44% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 23.27% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.37% | 25.36% | +9.01% |
Dividends
UHS vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than CBOE's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
UHS vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UHS vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CBOE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
CBOE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
CBOE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and CBOE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBOE has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to UHS (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs CBOE's -43.23%.
CBOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and CBOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer