UGE vs. FAI
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while FAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UGE returned -2.38% vs 72.81% for FAI. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FAI.
Performance
UGE vs. FAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 36.77% return.
UGE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- -2.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
FAI
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 17.27%
- YTD
- 36.77%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 72.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGE vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 9.38% | -5.21% | -5.33% |
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 36.77% | 33.37% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and FAI is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
FAI
UGE vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.47 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 3.88 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 12.65 | -12.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 2.99 | -3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.70 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
UGE vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than FAI's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and FAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -27.82% | -43.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -18.84% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.21% | -2.85% | -35.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -5.30% | -13.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.46% | 5.77% | +4.69% |
Volatility
UGE vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) is 7.52%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that UGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 8.57% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.44% | 19.40% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 24.47% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 29.89% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.07% | 29.89% | +3.18% |
UGE vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGE vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.23% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and FAI have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAI has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to UGE (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs FAI's -27.82%.
On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 72.81% vs -2.38% for UGE. On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UGE has been the lower-risk option at 7.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 72.81% return vs -2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FAI is Technology Equities. UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.65% for FAI.
FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGE and FAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer