UGE vs. AIFD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while AIFD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by TCW. UGE is passively managed, while AIFD is actively managed. Over the past year, UGE returned 4.33% vs 73.62% for AIFD. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIFD.

Performance

UGE vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 38.09% return.

UGE

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: 15.44%
• 6M: 14.18%
• 1Y: 4.33%
• 3Y*: 6.07%
• 5Y*: -2.24%
• 10Y*: 8.70%

AIFD

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 38.09%
• 6M: 36.03%
• 1Y: 73.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGE vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods	15.44%	-5.21%	6.01%
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	38.09%	28.30%	15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between UGE and AIFD is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024	-0.15

The correlation between UGE and AIFD shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UGE vs. AIFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UGE	AIFD
Consumer Defensive	99.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	6.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	11.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	9.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	73.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UGE vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGE

UGE Risk / Return Rank: 11
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 88
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGE vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UGE	AIFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	2.67	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	3.13	-2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.42	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	6.30	-6.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	22.79	-22.39

UGE vs. AIFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the AIFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGE and AIFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UGE vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than AIFD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and AIFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UGE	AIFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.36%	-33.20%	-38.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.95%	-11.75%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.78%	-9.42%	-25.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.78%	-5.74%	-13.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.88%	3.24%	+7.64%

Volatility

UGE vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) is 10.37%, while TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that UGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UGE	AIFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.37%	13.46%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.94%	22.09%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.98%	27.78%	-1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.48%	29.98%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.12%	29.98%	+3.14%

UGE vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UGE vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison

UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods	2.11%	2.54%	1.43%	1.20%	0.74%	0.20%	0.41%	0.86%	0.76%	0.68%	0.76%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UGE and AIFD in my portfolio?

UGE and AIFD have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UGE or AIFD?

AIFD has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to UGE (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs AIFD's -33.20%.

Which ETF is better, UGE or AIFD?

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 73.62% vs 4.33% for UGE. On fees, AIFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGE has been the lower-risk option at 10.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UGE or AIFD?

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 73.62% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UGE or AIFD?

AIFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UGE or AIFD?

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

What is the main difference between UGE and AIFD?

UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AIFD is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.75% for AIFD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.