PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGA vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGA vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 70.69% return, which is significantly higher than OILK's 61.09% return.


UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%

OILK

1D
-1.91%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
61.09%
6M
56.40%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGA vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
61.09%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UGA and OILK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.81

The correlation between UGA and OILK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGA vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGA vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UGAOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

3.30

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

6.67

+6.19

UGA vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGA and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UGAOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.99

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.11

+0.01

Drawdowns

UGA vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, roughly equal to the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGAOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.59%

-83.76%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-17.35%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-23.42%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

-34.69%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.75%

-5.49%

-9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.76%

-32.60%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.20%

8.57%

-2.37%

Volatility

UGA vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) at 10.52%. This indicates that UGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGAOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

10.52%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.48%

23.32%

+7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.27%

28.82%

+6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.40%

30.13%

+4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

35.97%

+1.30%

UGA vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGA vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.34%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, UGA and OILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to OILK (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGA dropped -86.59% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 24.41% vs 17.28% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 10.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UGA and 0.68% for OILK.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGA and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer