UGA vs. BNDC
UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) and BNDC (FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline, while BNDC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Northern Trust. UGA is passively managed, while BNDC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, UGA returned 24.41%/yr vs -0.19%/yr for BNDC. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. UGA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BNDC.
Performance
UGA vs. BNDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 70.69% return, which is significantly higher than BNDC's 0.07% return.
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
BNDC
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- —
UGA vs. BNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
BNDC FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund | 0.07% | 7.29% | 0.86% | 5.36% | -13.54% | -2.01% | 8.66% | 9.57% | -1.49% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGA and BNDC is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2016 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UGA and BNDC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.38, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGA vs. BNDC — Risk / Return Rank
UGA
BNDC
UGA vs. BNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGA | BNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 1.49 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 4.39 | +8.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGA | BNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.09 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.03 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.21 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
UGA vs. BNDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than BNDC's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and BNDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGA | BNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -18.80% | -67.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -2.87% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -6.30% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -18.60% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.75% | -3.34% | -11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | -7.35% | -29.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 0.97% | +5.23% |
Volatility
UGA vs. BNDC - Volatility Comparison
United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) at 1.23%. This indicates that UGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGA | BNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 1.23% | +10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.48% | 2.78% | +27.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.27% | 3.99% | +31.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 6.07% | +28.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 8.05% | +29.22% |
UGA vs. BNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGA vs. BNDC - Dividend Comparison
UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDC FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund | 4.15% | 4.16% | 3.81% | 3.19% | 2.64% | 1.72% | 2.61% | 2.89% | 2.86% | 2.50% | 0.64% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGA and BNDC have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to BNDC (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGA dropped -86.59% vs BNDC's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 24.41% vs -0.19% for BNDC. On fees, BNDC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BNDC has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 24.41% return vs -0.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
BNDC has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
UGA is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BNDC is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UGA and 0.35% for BNDC.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGA and BNDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer