PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDC vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDC vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.13% return.


BNDC

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.62%
6M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.29%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.61%

BND

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.02%
YTD
0.13%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
1.44%
ALL TIME*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$518.24M$512.19M$593.29M
$304.06K$242.59K$237.10K

BNDC vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
-0.29%7.29%0.86%5.36%-13.54%-2.01%8.66%9.57%-1.49%3.97%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.13%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDC and BND is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2016

0.85

The correlation between BNDC and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDC vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNDC
BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNDC vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDCBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.87

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

2.15

-0.58

BNDC vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDC and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDC vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDCBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-18.58%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.68%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.24%

-4.81%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-17.81%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-2.50%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-3.06%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.08%

+0.15%

Volatility

BNDC vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.04%. This indicates that BNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDCBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.04%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

2.93%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

3.63%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

6.03%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

5.53%

+2.47%

BNDC vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDC vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.03%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
4.17%4.16%3.81%3.19%2.64%1.72%2.61%2.89%2.86%2.50%0.64%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BNDC and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BNDC has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to BND (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDC dropped -18.80% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 5-year performance, BND leads with -0.20% vs -0.57% for BNDC. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BND has performed better with a -0.20% return vs -0.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNDC.

BNDC has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 4.03% for BND.

BNDC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNDC and 0.03% for BND.

BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDC and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer