UFO vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

UFO (Procure Space ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. UFO is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

UFO vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Space ETF (UFO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

UFO

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: -14.71%
• 6M: -4.90%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 43.87%
• 3Y*: 32.66%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFO vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UFO Procure Space ETF	13.16%	0.23%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between UFO and POW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

UFO vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFO

UFO Risk / Return Rank: 34
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFO vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UFO	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.88	—	—

Drawdowns

UFO vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	UFO	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.33%	-20.28%	-30.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.50%	-20.28%	-15.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.88%	-4.56%	-17.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UFO	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.87%	33.06%	+8.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.90%	33.06%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.28%	33.06%	-1.78%

UFO vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UFO and POW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

UFO vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UFO Procure Space ETF	0.34%	0.46%	1.98%	1.90%	3.19%	1.00%	1.07%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UFO and POW in my portfolio?

UFO and POW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UFO or POW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UFO or POW?

UFO and POW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UFO or POW?

UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between UFO and POW?

UFO is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and VistaShares.