UFEB vs. POCT
UFEB (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - UFEB tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect February Series Index while POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UFEB returned 7.22%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
UFEB vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFEB achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's 5.56% return.
UFEB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
UFEB vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February | 5.10% | 10.57% | 12.93% | 11.91% | -5.85% | 7.31% | 5.78% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.56% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFEB and POCT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between UFEB and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
UFEB vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFEB
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UFEB
POCT
Financial Services
UFEB
POCT
Communication Services
UFEB
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
UFEB
POCT
Healthcare
UFEB
POCT
Industrials
UFEB
POCT
Consumer Defensive
UFEB
POCT
Energy
UFEB
POCT
Utilities
UFEB
POCT
Real Estate
UFEB
POCT
Basic Materials
UFEB
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFEB vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
UFEB
POCT
UFEB vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UFEB | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.48 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 3.35 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 17.20 | +1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UFEB | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.40 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 1.25 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
UFEB vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFEB drawdown since its inception was -13.32%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFEB and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFEB | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -18.80% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -4.40% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.69% | -10.22% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.02% | -10.22% | +1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -1.50% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.86% | -0.07% |
Volatility
UFEB vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFEB | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.79% | 4.77% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 6.15% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 7.94% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 10.22% | -2.56% |
UFEB vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UFEB and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
UFEB vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither UFEB nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
UFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFEB and POCT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POCT has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to UFEB (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFEB dropped -13.32% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.87% vs 7.22% for UFEB. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UFEB and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
UFEB and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect February Series Index, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.
UFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFEB and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer