PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFEB vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UFEB vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UFEB vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UFEB
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February
-1.32%10.57%12.93%11.91%-5.85%1.86%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.13%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFEB achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than BALT's -0.13% return.


UFEB

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
1.42%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.97%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UFEB vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UFEB vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFEB
UFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
UFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFEB vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UFEBBALTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.49

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

2.29

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.91

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.91

12.79

-0.87

UFEB vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFEB and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UFEBBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.70

-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between UFEB and BALT is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UFEB vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither UFEB nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UFEB vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFEB drawdown since its inception was -13.32%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFEB and BALT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UFEBBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-4.89%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-3.48%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-1.05%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-0.35%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.52%

+0.52%

Volatility

UFEB vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.61%. This indicates that UFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UFEBBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

0.61%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

1.84%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

4.48%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

3.36%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

3.36%

+4.37%