PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFEB vs. UAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UFEB vs. UAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UFEB vs. UAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UFEB
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February
-0.91%10.57%12.93%11.91%-5.85%7.31%5.78%
UAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
2.08%6.27%12.38%10.60%-5.67%5.32%-5.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFEB achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than UAPR's 2.08% return.


UFEB

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
1.70%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

UAPR

1D
0.24%
1M
1.12%
YTD
2.08%
6M
3.96%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UFEB vs. UAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UFEB and UAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

UFEB vs. UAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFEB
UFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

UAPR
UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFEB vs. UAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UFEBUAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

1.65

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

2.50

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.16

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.90

14.54

-2.64

UFEB vs. UAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the UAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFEB and UAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UFEBUAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.85

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.53

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between UFEB and UAPR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UFEB vs. UAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither UFEB nor UAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
UFEB
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.17%

Drawdowns

UFEB vs. UAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFEB drawdown since its inception was -13.32%, smaller than the maximum UAPR drawdown of -14.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFEB and UAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UFEBUAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-14.61%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-5.58%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.02%

-10.84%

+1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

0.00%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-3.39%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.83%

+0.22%

Volatility

UFEB vs. UAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) at 1.16%. This indicates that UFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UFEBUAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

1.16%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

2.13%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

7.14%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

6.88%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

8.50%

-0.77%