PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 18.13% return.


UEVM

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.45%
6M
2.40%
YTD
9.19%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.82%

XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$142.75K$200.41K$201.25K
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M

UEVM vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
9.19%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.04%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.13%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and XMVM is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.51

The correlation between UEVM and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UEVM vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
XMVM

Financial Services

26.7%
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
1.2%

Industrials

9.7%
11.7%

Healthcare

8.7%
2.5%

Technology

8.6%
5.1%

Basic Materials

7.4%
0.8%

Energy

5.9%
13.5%

Utilities

5.0%
8.5%

Real Estate

4.2%
4.9%

Communication Services

2.2%
0.9%

Financial Services

UEVM
26.7%
XMVM
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
11.6%
XMVM
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
10.1%
XMVM
1.2%

Industrials

UEVM
9.7%
XMVM
11.7%

Healthcare

UEVM
8.7%
XMVM
2.5%

Technology

UEVM
8.6%
XMVM
5.1%

Basic Materials

UEVM
7.4%
XMVM
0.8%

Energy

UEVM
5.9%
XMVM
13.5%

Utilities

UEVM
5.0%
XMVM
8.5%

Real Estate

UEVM
4.2%
XMVM
4.9%

Communication Services

UEVM
2.2%
XMVM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UEVM vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEVMXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.48

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

4.28

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

13.71

-8.15

UEVM vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-62.83%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.18%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-24.12%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-24.12%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.12%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-10.19%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.86%

+0.51%

Volatility

UEVM vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that UEVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.30%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

9.25%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

14.72%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

21.24%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

22.74%

-4.38%

UEVM vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than XMVM's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
2.66%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and XMVM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEVM has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 5-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.87% vs 8.36% for UEVM. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.87% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.78% for XMVM.

UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer