PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 4.05% return.


UEVM

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.45%
6M
2.40%
YTD
9.19%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.82%

MMTM

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.78%
6M
1.50%
YTD
4.05%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
14.15%
ALL TIME*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$361.33K$398.75K$394.98K
$142.75K$200.41K$201.25K

UEVM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
9.19%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.04%
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
4.05%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and MMTM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.59

The correlation between UEVM and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UEVM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
MMTM

Financial Services

26.7%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
2.7%

Industrials

9.7%
11.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
6.6%

Technology

8.6%
42.6%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.8%

Energy

5.9%
4.5%

Utilities

5.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

4.2%
1.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
11.4%

Financial Services

UEVM
26.7%
MMTM
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
11.6%
MMTM
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
10.1%
MMTM
2.7%

Industrials

UEVM
9.7%
MMTM
11.0%

Healthcare

UEVM
8.7%
MMTM
6.6%

Technology

UEVM
8.6%
MMTM
42.6%

Basic Materials

UEVM
7.4%
MMTM
1.8%

Energy

UEVM
5.9%
MMTM
4.5%

Utilities

UEVM
5.0%
MMTM
2.0%

Real Estate

UEVM
4.2%
MMTM
1.6%

Communication Services

UEVM
2.2%
MMTM
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UEVM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEVMMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.40

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

4.74

+0.82

UEVM vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-33.85%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.89%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-22.08%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-23.72%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-6.09%

+4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-4.20%

-7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.91%

+0.46%

Volatility

UEVM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 4.13%, while State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

5.24%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

11.88%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

15.45%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

18.35%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

18.72%

-0.36%

UEVM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than MMTM's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.89%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
2.66%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMTM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to UEVM (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 5-year performance, MMTM leads with 11.57% vs 8.36% for UEVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.89% for MMTM.

UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.12% for MMTM.

UEVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer