PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEVM vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEVM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UEVM having a 8.99% return and MMTM slightly higher at 9.16%.


UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

MMTM

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.58%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEVM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
9.16%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UEVM and MMTM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.59

The correlation between UEVM and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UEVM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UEVM
MMTM

Financial Services

17.7%
16.0%

Technology

15.5%
29.5%

Industrials

8.7%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
6.7%

Energy

5.2%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
12.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.0%

Healthcare

4.4%
10.8%

Utilities

4.1%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.0%
7.7%

Financial Services

UEVM
17.7%
MMTM
16.0%

Technology

UEVM
15.5%
MMTM
29.5%

Industrials

UEVM
8.7%
MMTM
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

UEVM
5.5%
MMTM
6.7%

Energy

UEVM
5.2%
MMTM
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UEVM
5.0%
MMTM
12.4%

Basic Materials

UEVM
4.6%
MMTM
2.0%

Healthcare

UEVM
4.4%
MMTM
10.8%

Utilities

UEVM
4.1%
MMTM
2.6%

Real Estate

UEVM
2.8%
MMTM
3.1%

Communication Services

UEVM
2.0%
MMTM
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEVM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEVM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEVMMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.46

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

11.15

-2.50

UEVM vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEVM and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEVMMMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.72

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.85

-0.52

Drawdowns

UEVM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEVMMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-33.85%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.89%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-22.08%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-23.72%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.48%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-4.20%

-7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.18%

+0.71%

Volatility

UEVM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.35%. This indicates that UEVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEVMMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

2.35%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

10.73%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

14.19%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

18.20%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.65%

-0.26%

UEVM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEVM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEVM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEVM has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 5-year performance, MMTM leads with 13.50% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.12% for MMTM.

MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEVM and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer