UEVM vs. EMDM
UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) and EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UEVM returned 18.34%/yr vs 32.95%/yr for EMDM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UEVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMDM.
Performance
UEVM vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 39.03% return.
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDM
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 39.03%
- 6M
- 45.21%
- 1Y
- 91.32%
- 3Y*
- 32.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 13.25% |
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 39.03% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEVM and EMDM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between UEVM and EMDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
UEVM vs. EMDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UEVM
EMDM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
UEVM
EMDM
Technology
UEVM
EMDM
Industrials
UEVM
EMDM
Consumer Defensive
UEVM
EMDM
Energy
UEVM
EMDM
Consumer Cyclical
UEVM
EMDM
Basic Materials
UEVM
EMDM
Healthcare
UEVM
EMDM
Utilities
UEVM
EMDM
Real Estate
UEVM
EMDM
-
Communication Services
UEVM
EMDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEVM vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank
UEVM
EMDM
UEVM vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEVM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.66 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 5.87 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 24.30 | -15.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEVM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 3.92 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.58 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
UEVM vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than EMDM's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and EMDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEVM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -18.81% | -26.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -15.65% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -18.81% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -1.32% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -4.07% | -7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.77% | -0.88% |
Volatility
UEVM vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is 5.15%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that UEVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEVM | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 9.61% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 20.78% | -8.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 23.42% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 19.79% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 19.79% | -1.40% |
UEVM vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEVM vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison
UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than EMDM's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.57% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEVM and EMDM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDM has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs EMDM's -18.81%.
On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 32.95% vs 18.34% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 32.95% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 2.57% for EMDM.
UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while EMDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.75% for EMDM.
EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UEVM and EMDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer