UEVM vs. BIL
UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEVM returned 7.30%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for BIL. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UEVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
UEVM vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return.
UEVM
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
UEVM vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 6.12% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.04% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.67% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEVM and BIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.01 |
The correlation between UEVM and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEVM vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
UEVM
BIL
UEVM vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UEVM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -170.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 87.16 | -85.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 352.24 | -350.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 2,793.11 | -2,786.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UEVM vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEVM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -0.78% | -44.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -0.01% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -0.01% | -18.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.73% | -0.09% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | 0.00% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -0.26% | -11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.00% | +3.00% |
Volatility
UEVM vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that UEVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEVM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 0.07% | +6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 0.14% | +12.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 0.20% | +15.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 0.26% | +15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 0.26% | +18.16% |
UEVM vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEVM vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 2.85% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEVM and BIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UEVM has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 5-year performance, UEVM leads with 7.30% vs 3.45% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UEVM has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.85% for UEVM.
UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while BIL is Government Bonds. UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UEVM and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer